The Canadian government, lead by the Liberal party of Canada, have used multiple Orders in Council (OIC) to ban roughly 1.7 Million firearms in Canada so far. In addition, the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois have supported the Liberals new bill, C-21. C-21 and its amendments, if passed, could lead to virtually all firearms in Canada being banned. While this has been labelled misinformation by the Liberals, it’s easy to show that this is true.
For more information, visit http://scrapc21.ca 🍁 #ScrapC21
Lets talk firearms,
OK, our Canadian courts have ruled in our past that Canadians have the right to protect themselves in a self defence nature. Now I do trust that most of not all sane Canadians accept this and want it to be maintained.
Questions I’ll ask.
1: Do you believe that a citizen has the right to protect themselves from any potential violent acts upon them?
2: Do you believe that a citizen has the right to protect their family/ loved ones from any potential violent acts upon them?
3: Do you believe that a citizen has the right to protect others who they may know, such friends, neighbours, co-workers from any potential violent acts upon them?
4: Do you believe that a citizen has the right to protect even a stranger in life on the streets from any potential violent acts upon them?
5: Do you believe that a citizen has the right to protect their own property, such as house, autos, other valuables from any potential violent acts or thefts upon these?
Now if any of you said YES to any or one of the above questions, my next series of questions will test your understanding and resolve. BTW if any of you said NO to these questions above, then you agree that YOU have no rights to protect yourselves and such from an potential violent attacks. You’d rather just lay down and be attacked and possibly murdered instead of any logical defence of life and liberty. 🙁
1: If you agree to the right of self defence, then what level of such will you accept?
fists?
Feet?
Club/bat?
Pipe?
Chain?
Knife?
Axe?
Spear instrument?
Mace/Bear Spray?
Firearm?
A logical thinking person who accepts the right to defend their life, the lives of loved ones, friends, others, even the right to protect personal property, SHOULD SAY YES TO ALL THE CHOICES ABOVE!
If I have the right and I do according to our laws of self defence then why should any other persons including government deny me the ability to use any of the choices above?
The best choice as in the best equalizer would be a firearm. Of course if one is to legally own any firearm they must be responsible in ownership, knowing how to use and when to employ said firearms. That said of all the choices above, no other offers the best equalizer in a potential violent act upon the person than firearms.
ie: A woman say 5’4″ tall and 120 lbs. if in some violent confrontation with ANY generally healthy male but lets say in this case for discussion a 6’2″ 210lb. male who is looking for a physical confrontation with her, he will not be worried if she has no defensive weapons, he will be more careful if she has a stabbing instrument or a irritating spray, BTW because of decades of the illness of liberalism (suffered mostly by urban/suburban women in Canada) we see that mace/bear spray as a defensive weapon is illegal in Canada. But back to my point, said weapons will concern the male thug but odds are he may feel he can disarm the female and get what he wants as well as use those weapons against her.
But if she has a handgun with her (legally of course) and is responsible enough to know how to use it, is prepared to use it in her defence, then she now is in the driver’s seat, has the advantage and can defend herself at a safer distance. If the male thug has a gun too, then they are at least equals now.
ie#2: It’s 2am and you wake up hearing noises outside your house, if you have a firearm for defence (the best would be an AR-15 style semi-auto rifle) you can defend yourself, family and properly from a potential/actual break in that itself could be violent from a safer distance from the likely door the perp or perps as you don’t know how many there may be will use to gain entry. Such defence could likely stop the break in from being successful. BUT! did you all know what our law enforcement officers would likely say to you if you were to be in such situation? In my growingly pathetic, liberal/ socialist diseased Canada they would tell you to find a way to escape your house instead trying to prevent the break in’s success. YOU in defence may find yourself being charged for defending yourself, family and property and GOD HELP YOU IF YOU USED A GUN DOING SO IN LIBERAL DISEASED CANADA!
BTW how many cops would just run to escape their home being broken in to? My gut tells me few would and most would likely use a gun to stop the break in.
Listen, IF I HAVE THE RIGHT TO SELF DEFENCE THEN NO PERSONS, NO GOVERNMENT, NO BUREAUCRATS, NO COPS, SHOULD PREVENT ME FROM LEGALLY BUYING ANY FIREARMS LAWFULLY MANUFACTURED! That includes.
hand guns.
bolt action rifles.
lever action rifles.
semi-automatic rifles.
shot guns.
WHO THE HELL ARE ANY OF YOU (mostly mentally diseased liberals/socialists) TO DENY ME THE BEST OPTIONS FOR PROTECTION OF MY LIFE, FAMILY, FRIENDS, EVEN OTHERS AS WELL AS PROPERTY!?!
BTW the b.s. argument of, “You own nothing that is worth possibly taking another life over.” should be met with the counter point, “Hey, criminals or potential criminals, THERE IS NOTHING INSIDE THAT HOME, BUSINESS OR OUTER BUILDINGS THAT YOU ALL SHOULD WANT TO STEAL SO BADLY, THAT YOU ALL MAY RISK LOSING YOU LIKELY PATHETIC LIVES OVER!”
Vote/fight to bring back any and all lawfully manufactured firearms of choice to Canadians to legally buy if they so wish to. BUT TO SAVE CANADA?THE WESTERN WORLD, FIGHT THE MENTAL DISORDER OF LIBERALISM, ITS SOCIAL (IN)JUSTICE WAYS, ITS SICKLY (OFTEN HIPPOCRATIC FILLED) LIBERAL VIRTUE SIGNALLING AND IN GENERAL THE ACTUAL REGRESSIVE WAYS OF SOCIAL PROGRESSIVISM!