Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has applied to have me put in prison for 83 days, by William Makis MD

As you read through my comment, please understand that I have absolutely no affinity for anything that was done by the Senior Management of the Alberta Health Services (AHS) and/or the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons during the phony Covid-19 fiasco. There is no doubt in my mind that all of these persons knew it was a psychological and invented medical “scam” in order to gain government “control” over Canadian citizens.

However, with regard to this particular matter. It would appear that he (Makis) at some time during the Covid fiasco had filed some sort of a civil action against AHS and the College of Physicians and Surgeons. As is usual, it is more than likely that the matter was assigned a “Case Management” Judge who would require both parties to deal with any and all applications filed during the course of the proceedings.

Once he (Makis) starts a Civil Action as a Plaintiff, a public accessible file is opened in the Court Clerk’s office in whatever jurisdiction the Action is filed in. During the course of the proceedings any applications to a Judge, or rebuttal documents submitted by any Defendant and/or Plaintiff, or any proceedings that take place before a Judge are usually included into the public file.

It would appear that at sometime during the Case Management proceedings, he (Makis) and/or a member of his family, started attempting to make and file a criminal law complaint with some Police Agency or probably multiple Police Agencies. The Police would have refused simply because it was a current and ongoing Civil Law matter.

As a result it would appear that the AHS and/or the College for some reason must have thought there was a legitimate reason to request a “Prohibition Order” against Makis to cease and desist with his criminal complaints to the Police. Subsequently a Judge must have issued such an Order because it is a procedural fact of Civil Law that a purported “Complainant and/or Plaintiff” MUST apply to a Judge for permission to do that during the course of Civil Law action particularly if the matter has still not yet been subject to a Trial. The reason being that because of well established civil law “privilege” constraint issues regarding some documents and testimony in discovery hearings that apply to all parties involved in the civil action.

I’m guessing that he (Makis) must have disobeyed the Judge’s “Prohibition Order” issued on 29 January 2024 and thus it is now alleged that he would have been in “Contempt” of a Court Order.

As a part of the Civil Action document that Makis refers to, it appears to be an application to the Court Judge who issued the “Prohibition Order” by the AHS lawyers requesting that Judge to find Makis to now be in Contempt of the issuing Judge’s Court Order dated 29 January 2024 and asking that he be sentenced to a term of imprisonment and to pay the AHS and the College’s lawyer $10,000 towards their costs of dealing with this issue.

NOTE: The current Premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith would have had absolutely anything to do with this matter because it was he (Makis) who started the Court fight and it is a Civil Law lawsuit. As a result, it has nothing to do with Ms. Smith and/or her office.

I have always thought that Makis may have lost some of his “marbles” when listening to some of his videos. It’s a classic example of his personal issues being the fault of someone else other than himself. For his purpose of pursing his Civil action what he might want to do is to get a very good Civil Law lawyer and keep his mouth shut.

I know he was involved with the “Take Back Alberta” and the “1905” political groups. So perhaps that might form a large part of his legal ignorance.