CAP
May 24, 2022
As it is within most countries, legitimate examples of racism in Canada exist as historical fact. The Komagata Maru incident of 1914 is not one of them. At least, nowhere near the extent to which the multicultural industry has labelled it a model of white on anti-white racism. Why the rejection of a boatload of Indian nationalists has come to epitomize our country’s anti-racism industry is a mystery.
The SS Komagata Maru was a chartered ship featured in a challenge to the exclusion of immigrants from India. The event took place throughout the summer of 1914, on the eve of the First World War. The journey culminated in confrontation with officials, police and the military at the Port of Vancouver, and then in a deadly encounter with police and troops near Kolkata on the passengers’ return to India.
“The Komagata Maru steams all the way back to Calcutta, 20 of its passengers are killed in some kind of dockside melee, and the rest of the voyagers are imprisoned.”
Note that the deadly encounter component has nothing to do with Canada. The murders occurred not by way of the Canadian government, but rather the government of India. Still, it’s our fault, say the diversity-pushers.
Away from multicultural platitudes, we discover that the Komagata Maru travelled to our country for political purposes. Set aside by media is a tale of revolutionary and counter-revolutionary intrigue, double-agents, as well as terror and counter-terror relating to rebellion against the Indian government.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau doesn’t care about any of this. The rejection of the ship fits neatly into his agenda. It must be pounded into the brains of all Canadians that our country is racist:
“Canada will never forget the pain and suffering of the survivors.” said Trudeau in a recent statement. Pray-tell, where does one find the shame and sorrow expressed by the government of India? They’re the ones who committed the murders. On the Canadian side, no act of violence were recorded, let alone murders.
“In 1908, the Immigration Act was amended to include the Government of Canada’s ‘continuous journey regulation’ which prohibited the landing of any immigrant who did not come to Canada by continuous journey from the country of which they were natives or citizens.”
Read More HERE
